People online praise this employee for not questioning his boss’s instructions not to use his personal phone at work where he needs to access the system.
When people become managers, they want to establish their own authority and really gain control. Even after that, he occasionally reminds staff who is boss by asking them to do nonsensical things.
this Man I had a boss like that who told me he couldn’t use his personal phone for work and wanted to annoy him, but I didn’t think that meant he couldn’t do his job. However, the employee would not argue.
Employees were prohibited from using personal phones at work
Image credit: Scott Rubin (not actual photo)
So, knowing the company wasn’t ready, they removed all work-related apps and demanded desktop versions of them.
Image credit: Mr. Wako
The result was days of scrolling through the Internet and having the last laugh when their boss tried to micromanage them.
MrWacko, the original poster (OP) of the story, works in IT cybersecurity. The nature of his job requires him to use a phone so that he can access the systems and software he needs, but only the company does not provide a work phone, so the employee uses a personal phone. need to do it.
For some reason, OP’s boss didn’t really like him and thought it was time to remind him of his work procedure. The boss pointed out that we were not allowed to use personal devices, of which he mentioned the phone as one.
When a person deals with cybersecurity, it is quite understandable that there is a rule to use only company equipment for work.
However, the employee was simply mad at his boss and he was the only one targeted, so he decided to comply. I uninstalled everything from my personal phone and requested the desktop version of the app so I could continue working.
It caused chaos and the boss didn’t expect the approval of the required software and had to rush, but the OP didn’t have access to the system he needed so he had nothing else to do and calmed down. I was browsing the internet. work.
Redditors are another case of arrogant bosses not asking people who actually work and have knowledge of how things work to get what they deserve. Maybe your boss is afraid to admit you don’t really know something because it reduces your authority, but it happens all the time.
It’s actually called the Peter Principle. investedia It explains “the observation that in most organizational hierarchies, such as in large companies, each employee tends to move up the hierarchy by promotion until they reach their level of incompetence.”
In simpler terms, people who are good at the position get promoted until things go wrong.
Image credit: Brian (not actual photo)
bored panda reached out to Memory NgwiAs an occupational psychologist, he explained: Most of the time people are promoted as a reward for playing their current role without assessing whether it adds value in a higher role. This leads to people being promoted to roles beyond their capabilities. ”
Mr. Memory Nguwi observed that incompetent people are picked for higher roles because companies do not check the appropriate “whether an individual can play a higher role”. Instead, they rely on their past performances in their current roles. In situations where an individual has been promoted to a higher role in which they are incompetent, they reduce that role to their comfort level. This means that instead of focusing on new roles that require specific skill sets, they want to do subordinate work and macro management.
Organizations can avoid the Peter effect by training and improving the qualifications of the people they are trying to promote. But occupational psychologists argue that work requires more than knowledge of how to do a task, and that other skills cannot be taught in all cases. (2) work knowledge (not qualifications) and integrity (mainly due to personal character); These are the top three predictors of job performance in the order listed. Organizations tend to rely on qualifications and ignore other parts. Whether training can rectify the challenges posed by the Peter principle depends heavily on assessing suitability for higher roles, focusing on his three predictors highlighted above. Jobs vary in complexity as you move up. Training is useless if an individual lacks the cognitive skills to assume a higher role. When an organization tries to promote a cognitively incompetent individual to a higher role, that person is almost certain to fail. If an individual lacks job knowledge but has the appropriate cognitive skills for the role, they can be trained. It cannot be modified. ”
There are clear negative consequences that follow, with Investopedia pointing to ineffective leadership as the biggest consequence. business standard Managers themselves point out that they become lazy and incompetent because they find themselves not competent enough for their roles and are frustrated at not being able to move up.
Those feelings “devise complex strategies that are difficult for subordinates to follow. Managers multiply the need for procedures, demand unrealistic perfection, interfere and criticize subordinates’ work, They may develop peculiar habits, such as shutting out new ideas from their subordinates and insisting that their desks be kept clean (paperwork to them or stacking files and papers on their desks to do the exact opposite). (to give the illusion of heavy work).”
Memory Nguwi added:Conclusion from one person study “Consistent with this hypothesis, we found that companies were significantly more likely to promote their top salespeople, even if these employees were, on average, poor managers and marginal This behavior leads companies to promote workers who underperform subordinates by 30% compared to promotion policies that optimize match quality. ”
This is exactly what a lot of people with bosses like the OP are complaining about, what managers don’t realize is actually what motivates their employees to do their job and start work in the morning is hindering
In Memory Nguwi’s opinion, this particular boss in the Reddit story most likely didn’t learn from his mistakes because he believed the person’s actions were character flaws. In fact, experts say so. My assessment is that the boss also seems to have personality problems (in addition to his inability to take on the role). This is even worse if you feel incompetent. They are jealous of their subordinates’ work and control them. They make unreasonable demands. ”
Do you think OP taught his boss to be more cooperative in the future? Do you think it’s possible to know if a person would make a good manager before they get promoted? , do you think some people are not fit to be managers? Let us know in the comments what you think about the story and the Peter Effect.
People in the comments believed their boss got the reality check he deserved
Image credit: Alper Çuğun (not actual photo)