A colleague has tipped off a fast-food worker who was fired for providing more food than he paid for a family in need.
People often try to do the right thing. However, having good intentions does not guarantee success in doing the right thing. In real-life situations, he is often faced with conflicting needs and complex situations in which he chooses the lesser of two evils. This allows people to argue about what was the right thing to do in a particular situation, and sometimes admit that there was a better solution to the problem or course of action to take. This man shared an example of such a dilemma.
More information: reddit
This man tried to help a family in need by adding extra food to their order, but it was submitted by a colleague
Image credit: Ari Alcantara (not actual image)
An employee served a family of three who ordered one meal even though they knew the man was hungry
Image credit: u/Throwtifu687304
The man felt bad about the situation and his colleagues just shrugged their shoulders when they saw him.
Image credit: iMin technology (not actual image)
The next day, the family ordered the same meal, but the kind employee used a larger box and filled it with nuggets and fries.
Image credit: u/Throwtifu687304
Workers knew that the employee was not allowed and would be fired for giving away extra food for free.
Image credit: Engin_Akyurt (not actual image)
Two weeks later, the family came to thank the kindhearted man and told him that they had finally received the much-needed supplies.
This man observed an older couple while working at a fast food restaurant and assumed they were their granddaughter. He says that after a short deliberation and counting their money, the family ordered the children’s meals.
As this family sat nearby, the man saw the child eating, and the grandparents reassured him that the child was not hungry. It seemed to me that
The man explained that he felt uncomfortable about the situation, and his colleagues simply shrugged their shoulders when they saw him.
When the family came back the next day and ordered the same meal, the man secretly used a large box and topped it off with nuggets and fries.
He emphasizes that he did all this knowing that employees weren’t allowed to hand out food for free. There were several.
Anyway, the man was happy to see everyone eating. He continued to feed the family with extra food for his two weeks, after which they became grateful for surviving two difficult days. The couple also shared that, fortunately, they received a much-needed resource.
The same colleague who witnessed the man feeding his family saw that they thanked the man but said nothing to him. At the time, his colleague told his manager about it.
Ultimately, he was summoned by the manager and fired for stealing from the restaurant — there was video footage and witnesses
Image credit: Cotton Bro Studios (not actual image)
The man says his colleague had good reason to submit him. Because they both applied for the same position and were waiting to hear who won it.
As a result, the man was called in by the manager and fired for stealing from the restaurant and handing out extra food.
He says his colleagues had good reason to submit him. Because they were both applying for the same position and asking who would get it.
Regarding the hunger problem in economically developed countries, Graham RichHe makes an important distinction between food aid and charity and rights in terms of food. He argues that charitable food banks only serve as short-term relief.
The bigger problem begins when people and politicians begin to believe that food banks are enough to solve the hunger problem. The idea is not. Riches suggests that governments think and act outside the box of charity food and instead incorporate human rights into a proper food approach.
The majority of commenters expressed their support for the redditor’s actions as they were done out of good sense and compassion. The phrase “kindness goes a long way” was used to describe his act. It was also noted that the man’s boss may have given him the opportunity to at least pay for the extra meal.
But others agreed with the man’s own assessment that he should have taken a different approach. Helping people is good. But if the man wanted to help, he should have paid it out of his own pocket rather than doing charity with other people’s money. I tried to collect money from my co-workers, or asked the manager if I could distribute extra food.